Finalist-PhilBlogAwards 2010

Finalist-PhilBlogAwards 2010
Finalist for society, politics, history blogs

BrightWorld

Pages

Showing posts with label FAO. Show all posts
Showing posts with label FAO. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 22, 2012

GLOBAL FOOD PRICE INDEX DECLINE

GLOBAL FOOD PRICE INDEX DECLINE

Erle Frayne D. Argonza

Global food price index ended up with a general decline, as per report from the FAO. This was a quick reversal of the year-long trend that saw food prices rising as a whole.

The FAO reported in the mid-phase of last year that food prices were rising, and rising alarmingly. Famine struck the Horn of Africa, while calamities damaged to food base of other countries, events that shook the world food terrain.

Last year also saw the raging conflicts in the MENA (middle east & north Africa), political quakes that also affected the supply chain of food production and distribution. As of this writing, a world war prospect looms as Iran has been threatening to close the Hormuz area, and pronouncements have already been leading to speculations in the oil spot markets and food trading.

Will the pattern of declining food price index hold through for 2012?

[Philippines, 09 February 2012]

Source: http://www.fao.org/news/story/en/item/119775/icode/

FAO Food Price Index ends year with sharp decline / But record high prices mark the year as a whole

12 January 2012, Rome - Food prices fell in December 2011 with the FAO Food Price Index dropping 2.4 percent, or five points from November, FAO said today.

At its new level of 211 points, the Index was 11.3 percent (27 points) below its peak in February 2011.

The decline was driven by sharp falls in international prices of cereals, sugar and oils due to bumper 2011 crops coupled with slowing demand and a stronger US dollar. Most commodities were affected.

However, although prices dropped steadily in the second half of 2011, the Index averaged 228 points in 2011 — the highest average since FAO started measuring international food prices in 1990. The previous high was in 2008 at 200 points.

A period of uncertainty

Commenting on the new figures, FAO Senior Grains Economist Abdolreza Abbassian said that it was difficult to make any firm prediction on price trends for the coming months.

“International prices of many food commodities have declined in recent months, but given the uncertainties over the global economy, currency and energy markets, unpredictable prospects lie ahead,” Abbassian said.

Among the principal commodities, cereal prices registered the biggest fall, with the FAO Cereal Price Index dropping 4.8 percent to 218 points in December. Record crops and an improved supply outlook sent prices of major cereals declining significantly. Maize prices fell 6 percent, wheat 4 percent and rice 3 percent. In 2011, the FAO cereal price index averaged 247 points, up some 35 percent from 2010 and the highest since the 1970s.

Oils and fats down

The FAO Oils and Fats Price Index stood at 227 points in December, down 3 percent from November and well below the level of 264 points one year ago. Larger than expected overall supplies of vegetable oil led to a rise in stocks (notably palm and sunflower oil), which, together with poor global demand for soybeans, deflated prices.

The FAO Meat Price Index averaged 179 points, slightly down compared with November. The decline was mainly driven by pig meat, whose price dropped by 2.2 percent, with sheep meat also receding somewhat. By contrast, poultry and bovine meat prices recorded mild gains. On an annual basis, meat prices in 2011 were 16 percent higher than in 2010.

Dairy products mostly up

The FAO Dairy Price Index averaged 202 points, almost unchanged from November. All dairy products were up slightly with the exception of butter, which dropped by 1 percent. Over the whole year, dairy products were on average 10 percent dearer than in 2010, with particularly strong gains witnessed for skim milk powder and casein, which gained 17 percent each. More modest increases were seen for butter and whole milk powder prices, which progressed by 11 percent, and cheese, by 8 percent.

The FAO Sugar Price Index declined for the fifth consecutive month to 327 points in December, down 4 percent from November and 18 percent from its July 2011 peak. The Index’s weakness in recent months mostly reflects expectations of a large world production surplus over the new season, on the back of good harvests in India, the European Union, Thailand and the Russian Federation.

Sunday, October 09, 2011

GLOBAL SOIL PARTNERSHIP FOR FOOD SECURITY

GLOBAL SOIL PARTNERSHIP FOR FOOD SECURITY

Erle Frayne D. Argonza

A great news about soil partnership—on a global scale—was recently churned out of the news mills of the Food and Agricultural Organization or FAO. Addressing soil problems at this juncture isn’t only timely, it is in fact a bit late already.

The problem with soil deterioration due to over-farming and over-grazing was already experienced across many nations as early as the 1980s yet. I still recall, as a young development expert and academic, how we stakeholders expressed chagrin over the abusive use of land by the tillers and biz herders. Even the lakes in my country PH were already being threatened by over-fishing through unregulated fishpens.

Today the ecological problem posed by agri-related concerns had already reached a near-catastrophic proportion globally. Global partnership to address soil problems is a very urgent strategy, more so that climate change had entered the arena with gargantuan challenges and threats.

The report on the subject is shown below.

[Philippines, 09 October 2011]

Source: http://www.fao.org/news/story/en/item/89277/icode/

Global Soil Partnership for Food Security launched at FAO / New effort to assure soils future generations

7 September 2011, Rome - FAO Director-General Jacques Diouf warned today that pressure on the world's soil resources and land degradation are threatening global food security. He called for a renewed international effort to assure sufficient fertile and healthy soils today and for future generations.

Diouf was speaking here at the start of a three-day meeting to launch a new Global Soil Partnership for Food security and Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation.

"Soil is an essential component of the world's production systems and ecosystems," Diouf said. "But it is also a fragile and non-renewable resource. It is very easily degraded and it is slow, difficult and expensive to regenerate," he added.

Increased pressure

Soil resources across the globe are subject to increased pressure from competing land uses and are affected by extensive degradation processes that rapidly deplete the limited amounts of soils and water available for food production, Diouf noted.

According to FAO, in Africa alone 6.3 million hectares of degraded farmland have lost their fertility and water-holding capacity and need to be regenerated to meet the demand for food of a population set to more than double in the next 40 years.

In 1982 FAO adopted a World Soil Charter spelling out the basic principles and guidelines for sustainable soil management and soil protection to be followed by governments and international organizations.

Implementation lacking

"However, there have been long delays in applying the Charter in many countries and regions of the world. New efforts to implement it must be made as soon as possible," Diouf said.

Besides helping implement the provisions of the World Soil Charter, the Global Soil Partnership is intended to raise awareness and motivate action by decision-makers on the importance of soils for food security and climate change adaptation and mitigation.

The partnership is also aimed at providing favourable policy environment and technical solutions for soil protection and management and at helping mobilize resources and expertise for joint activities and programmes.

The Global Soil Partnership will complement the 15-year-old Global Water Partnership initiated by the United Nations Development Programme and the World Bank in 1996 to coordinate the development and management of water, land, and related resources in order to maximise economic and social welfare without compromising the sustainability of vital environmental systems.

Greater resilience

Short-term interventions to provide food, water and basic needs such as seeds and fertilizer to kick-start agriculture is the usual response to food crises and extreme weather events such as in the Horn of Africa. However, longer-term and large-scale measures are needed in order to build greater resilience to degradation, drought and climate change and reduce human vulnerability to disasters.

The Horn of Africa crisis, with the ongoing famine in Somalia, is the most severe food security emergency in the world today. Besides issues of insecurity and governance, the crisis is caused to a large extent by inadequate soil and water management policies and practices.

The Rome meeting is expected to start work on an Action Plan on sustainable soil management that will develop synergies between partners and bring together work currently being done separately on soil survey, assessment and monitoring, soil productivity, soil carbon, soil biodiversity and ecology and soil and water conservation.

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

http://erleargonza.blogspot.com, http://unladtau.wordpress.com, http://www.facebook.com, http://www.newciv.org, http://sta.rtup.biz, http://magicalsecretgarden.socialparadox.com, http://en.netlog.com/erlefrayne, http://www.blogster.com/erleargonza, http://www.articlesforfree.net, http://ipeace.us, http://internationalpeaceandconflict.org, http://www.blogleaf.com/erleargonza, http://erleargonza.seekopia.com, http://lovingenergies.spruz.com, http://multiply.com/erleargonza, http://www.blogleaf.com/erleargonza, http://talangguro.blogfree.net

Monday, October 03, 2011

CHALLENGES & OPPORTUNITIES TO SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

CHALLENGES & OPPORTUNITIES TO SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Erle Frayne D. Argonza

Attaining development in the ‘sustainable’ criterion is a truly daunting task. Two development paths were traversed in the 20th century, with the USSR and USA serving as polarity of exemplars: socialism (statist) and capitalism (unbridled market). Extreme in their approaches to development, both models are now seen as unsustainable in the long run.

A hybridization of the two models is now taking place in China and Vietnam that have recharted their development compass along a social market route. Whether this model can be sustained in the long run remains to be observed.

Meantime, the following problematic concerns face the world community: poverty and inequality, climate change, food and energy security. They pose new challenges and opportunities as well. Solving all of them in a very integrated fashion is the big challenge of the day. They are key to sustainable development that must be pursued at the same time that results will dovetail on improving human development (longevity/health, literacy/education, gender empowerment).

Below is a lecture by Rebecca Grynspan, UN Undersecretary-General and UNDP Associate Administrator, about the subject matter. Update reports on poverty alleviation across the globe is fittingly shared to us by the noblesse lady.

[Philippines, 01 October 2011]

Source: http://www.beta.undp.org/undp/en/home/presscenter/speeches/2011/09/16/rebeca-grynspan-towards-sustainable-development-new-challenges-and-opportunities.html

Rebeca Grynspan: Towards sustainable development: New challenges and opportunities

16 September 2011

University Lecture by Rebeca Grynspan,
UN Under-Secretary-General and UNDP Associate Administrator
Towards Sustainable Development: New Challenges and Opportunities
Peking University
, Friday 16 September 2011

I am pleased to join you today on this, my first visit to China as Associate Administrator of the UN Development Programme.

Over the last three days, I’ve had the chance to meet with officials and Chinese people, from farmers to women leaders; to travel around Beijing and Tianjin, attend the World Economic Forum in Dalian; and witness some of the extensive development progress being made here in China.

It is now a privilege to join you here at Peking University – a university that is renowned not only in China but also throughout the world for its high standards of teaching and learning. I am especially gratified to have the opportunity to meet with talented young people from across China to talk about one of the most critical issues of our time – sustainable development.

I chose to focus my remarks on inclusive and sustainable development because it allows us to discuss some of the biggest challenges that both China and the world face – poverty and inequality, climate change, food and energy security– in an integrated manner. This is important because, in practice, reducing poverty and inequality, generating growth, advancing social development and sustainability are interconnected: in pursuing one, we can advance, slow, or stall progress in the other. To get all of them moving in the same direction, we need to understand and harness the connections between them.

Doing so offers the potential of delivering multiple dividends by reducing environmental degradation, creating jobs, and alleviating poverty.

In my remarks, I draw out some of the connections between these objectives, discuss progress towards them both in China and around the world, and suggest an integrated way forward.

I will say upfront, however, that there are not necessarily easy answers to our most profound questions, including

  • How can we best expand the benefits of growth while limiting carbon emissions and protecting our natural resources?
  • How do we avoid climate catastrophes that set back development prospects, particularly for the poorest?

What we do know, however, is that economic progress and poverty reduction cannot be sustained if the ecosystems on which we depend are irreparably damaged. We have no alternative but to pursue our objectives jointly through an integrated and renewed agenda for sustainable development.

Progress toward inclusive growth

The world has experienced enormous economic progress: in the past three decades, per capita income worldwide has almost doubled . Poverty reduction, particularly in Asia, has been similarly impressive. The absolute number of poor people living on $1.25 a day in Asia declined from 1.7 billion in 1981 to 753 million in 2008.

This means Asia lifted over 900 million people out of poverty in the last 27 years. This is mainly due to the remarkable success of China which alone lifted over 500 million people out of poverty in the same period, and has made one of the fastest increases in human development in the last 40 years.

Yet, there is no automatic link between economic growth and poverty reduction. Even in the fastest growing economies, economic benefits have not been consistently translated into poverty reduction. Recent studies also show that in the past two decades the poverty-reducing impact of economic growth has slowed, especially in Asia.

Asia’s dynamic economic performance has benefited many hundreds of millions of people, but it has also brought challenges – including inequality, environmental destruction, and geographic, ethnic, and gender disparities. We know inequality can grow while poverty decreases, so we need to put attention to both.

The Asian experience, in particular, has been marked by rising income inequality. During the last two decades, inequality in terms of Gini coefficient increased in 11 countries in the region, including China.

Progress worldwide has also been uneven, between and within countries. China’s dramatic progress in poverty reduction means that globally, the world is on track to reduce poverty by half by 2015. But of the 84 countries with available data on Millennium Development Goals, only 45 are on track to meet the target.

To overcome such challenges and advance human development, the quality of growth matters. That was a major finding of a review conducted last year by UNDP. In examining forty years of human development progress around the world, the review reinforced the results of earlier studies, finding that growth in per capita income is not strongly correlated to improvements in health and education.

Positive synergies, on the other hand, were identified between equity-promoting policies and human development. The review concluded that, to contribute to human development, it was important for growth to be both inclusive and sustainable. To take this lesson forward, UNDP works with its government partners to design policies and interventions which can advance growth which is both inclusive and sustainable.

Through inclusive growth, countries expand the number of people who participate productively in the economy as well as the number who benefit from its growth. To promote inclusive growth, countries can stimulate the sectors where the poor work, generate employment and expand infrastructure in the areas where the poor live, and increase access to safe water, sanitation, and reliable energy. Services also need to reach remote areas and be made available to those who are too often excluded. Attention to the vulnerable non-poor working group is also a concern, specially youth and women unemployment and economic opportunities.

Ethnic and linguistic minorities, for example, fare worse in most indicators of the world’s Millennium Development Goals. Taken together, these groups make up a sizable proportion of the world’s poor. Gender equality across the MDGs is also a matter deserving attention, so we need to be wary of focusing on averages as they can lead countries to miss the very divergences – in gender, ethnicity, sub-region etc –that we seek to overcome.

China’s leaders understand the importance of inclusive growth. The 12th Five-Year Plan spells out a detailed plan to advance inclusive growth. Importantly, it gives strong emphasis to increasing the wealth of the people as the wealth of the country. Indeed, President Hu Jintao’s call for a “harmonious society” recognises the risks of growing inequalities.

UNDP is working closely with China, sharing good practices and experiences around the world which have expanded opportunities and reduce inequalities. For example, UNDP works with Chinese Ministries in promoting social inclusion for migrant workers and their families, to seek to make sure they can access social services in China’s urban areas. We are also working with China to enhance women’s inclusion in the labour market. As the recent Asia-Pacific Human Development Report indicated, the ‘lost GDP’ in the region as a result of female exclusion from the labour market amounts to $89 billion. So including women is not only the right thing to do but also the SMART thing to do.

Progress towards sustainable growth

It is also important that growth is made sustainable, in order to increase resilience to external shocks and protect development gains. Social protection systems are an important investment in sustainability, as they shield the most vulnerable from the worst effects of shocks and can help prevent irreversible development setbacks.

Home grown social protection systems, if designed well, expand opportunities, build domestic demand, and spur human development.

Recent food, financial, and economic crises have made their value clear. Studies suggest that pre-existing social protection regimes had a measurable impact in helping the poor cope with the impact of the global economic crisis, for example, finding in particular that social protection systems enabled families to keep their children in school, avoiding long term welfare losses.

Basic protection programs are also affordable. The estimates of a social protection floor range around 2 per cent of GDP. Despite this, only about 20 per cent of the world’s working age population – mostly in middle- and upper- income countries -have effective access to comprehensive social protection systems. As China’s leaders have acknowledged, China’s own social protection schemes do not provide quality coverage to all China’s citizens. China has however set ambitious targets for universal social protection coverage by 2020 and is increasingly expanding healthcare insurance provision.

Environmental protection is also critical. Depleted or polluted natural resources, increasingly volatile weather patterns, and more frequent natural disasters can impede development progress and even cause reversals, particularly for the poorest people.

For many developing countries, the annual economic burden from poor environment-related health outcomes amounts to 2–4 percent of GDP.

According to the World Health Organization, 24 percent of the overall burden of disease worldwide, and 23 percent of all deaths, can be prevented through environmental interventions, especially improvements in water, sanitation, hygiene and indoor and urban air quality. Today, environment related health problems such as diarrhea, malaria, and acute respiratory infections remain the top killers of children under five in developing countries.

Every year, two million deaths—mostly women and children—die as a result of indoor air pollution from household use of traditional biomass fuels and coal. Malnutrition, an important contributor to child mortality, is often due as much or more to unsafe water, bad sanitation and disease than to insufficient food production.

Unfortunately progress worldwide is mixed, at best. The data shows that we are depleting the planet's natural assets at an unsustainable rate: deserts are spreading; water scarcity is increasing; tropical forests are shrinking; and the list is growing.

Looming above these threats, and exacerbating them, is climate change, spurred on by the relentless increase in global consumption of fossil fuels, which began with the Industrial Revolution.

More than two-thirds of global greenhouse gas emissions are due to human use of energy. Investing in energy efficiency and renewable energy yields significant returns with multiple beneficial impacts – not just on carbon emissions but for the economy as a whole.

It is possible to cut energy consumption in cities by 20–30 percent without sacrificing growth. In fact “green investment” can create many jobs and thus stimulate growth and poverty reduction. China is now the second largest producer of wind power in the world and the biggest exporter of photo-voltaic solar panels. China’s renewable energy sector employs 1.5 million people alone – 1.5 million people who were not working in this sector a decade ago.

China has shown leadership in establishing national policies that incentivize green growth, setting rigorous targets for energy efficiency and energy conservation, and making significant and growing investments in renewable energy.

Globally, at the recent Vienna Energy Forum held in June this year, the UN system advocated for a package of three simultaneous global energy goals by 2030: universal energy access, 40% energy intensity reduction and 30% renewable energy in the global energy mix. Pursued together, they can truly make energy a means for sustainable development.

Moving to low-carbon development

There are many ways countries can transition to cleaner, low -carbon, and climate-resilient economies, which also generate inclusive growth and reduce poverty. But achieving them often requires bold steps and a willingness to turn old development models on their head.

For example, gone are the days when clearing the world’s great forests for other land uses can be regarded as synonymous with development.

Far sighted governments, including in Indonesia, Brazil are working to put the United Nations Collaborative Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries (REDD+) into action. This innovative scheme links development gains to forest preservation, not to forest clearance. Already we have seen the success of this approach in Brazil, where deforestation rates have fallen sharply.

Business can and must also be a part of the solution. The proliferation of green certification systems indicates that future markets will demand greater compliance with environmentally and socially responsible standards. UNDP helps connect communities and businesses contributing to environmentally responsible development. In Ghana, for example, UNDP facilitated a partnership between the government and Kraft-Cadbury which helps local farmers adopt sustainable agricultural practices and increase their incomes. And in China, UNDP worked with Government to transform the market for environmental technologies, from solar water heaters to eco-friendly refrigerators, to energy-efficient light bulbs.

There are no simple blueprints to follow. We need to identify good practice and learn by doing. China has many lessons learned, technologies, and other resources that can help countries pursue low carbon development paths.

But to scale up, new climate financing, incentivized through a carbon market, will be needed to channel sufficient levels of investment into low-emissions infrastructure and technology. It will be critical that developed countries honour their commitments made in Copenhagen and Cancun to mobilize $100 billion per year by 2020 to support climate change mitigation and adaptation in developing countries.
So let me turn now to the adaptation to climate change challenge.

Adapting to climate change

Extreme weather events associated with climate change are occurring with increased frequency and are disproportionately affecting the poor.

China has certainly had its share of those extreme weather events:

  • Already this year in China floods have affected 36 million people and killed over 200.
  • Yet, elsewhere in China drought has left fourteen million residents short of drinking water.

The longer term impacts of climate change are adding to existing vulnerabilities around the world.

It has been estimated that if we do not change our ways, by 2080 an additional 600 million people worldwide may face malnutrition and an additional 1.8 billion people - more than the current population of China and the USA together - may face water shortages.

Developed countries see the importance of adapting to climate change and have the capacity and resources to invest heavily in infrastructure. According to the Global Human Development Report (2007/2008), the UK spends US$ 1.2 billion annually on flood defence. In contrast, funding for adaptation in Least Developed Countries amounted to US$26 million, equivalent to one week’s worth of spending in the UK flood defence programme.

This illustrates why it’s important to consider energy and climate change, environmental protection and food security in an integrated fashion.

China is doing just this by planting the seeds of a climate resilient, low carbon emitting agricultural sector. Through large-scale erosion control, agro-forestry and other agricultural innovations, farmers can increase their productivity, restore ecosystems, and make the landscape more resilient to floods and drought.

Bringing the local and global together

Twenty years ago in 1992, at the UN Conference on Environment and Development, held in Rio de Janeiro in Brazil, world leaders acknowledged the extent of environmental destruction caused by humans and set forth an agenda for change. It was a significant milestone on the road to sustainable development.

Eight months from now, in June 2012, world leaders will gather again in Rio for the UN Conference on Sustainable Development – to review progress over the last 20 years and determine what is needed to ensure a sustainable future going forward. It is critical that the world use the ‘Rio+20’ conference to renew its commitment to sustainable development, addressing not only carbon emissions but the broader issues of sustainable development, many of which we have touched on here. I commend the example set by China just last week, in hosting over 30 countries for an exchange of views on priorities for Rio plus 20; we will need more such opportunities for dialogue in the months ahead.

Business as usual, which leads to broken ecosystems and a warming climate, as well as to growing inequality, will increase poverty and hardship. It will destabilize economies, breed insecurity in many countries and undermine our goals for sustainable development.

We must, therefore grow green. China is well placed to show this in words and deeds. As the largest developing country in the world, offering its own sizeable support to other developing countries, China is in a unique position to inspire and promote sustainable development not only at home, but abroad.

In recognition of this, the Government of China and UNDP recently signed an agreement to strengthen our cooperation to share China’s experience and knowledge with other developing countries. China’s experience and its ongoing innovations can save other developing countries much needed time and expense in designing their own low-emission, climate-resilient paths. UNDP stands ready to use its global network to help facilitate and support all such efforts.

If current generations fail to address our urgent challenges, future generations will suffer the consequences. It’s important that in tackling our challenges we hear the voices of young people, such as yourselves, on whom the responsibility for future decisions will fall - and by whom the impact of today’s decisions will be felt.

Our individual initiatives will only add up to collective progress if the right technologies, institutions and incentives are in place. This requires visionary leadership willing to defend longer term goals and invest in green growth. Such leadership, political will and commitment are not created in a vacuum – they are propelled by public opinion and collective support.

The decades and generations in the future will look back to us and at this time now as a turning point. It is now more critical than ever for us to understand the connections between poverty reduction, generating growth, advancing social development, and achieving sustainability. If we wish to avoid undermining the gains we have made in reducing poverty in the last few decades, we must focus on the quality of growth to ensure it results in human development. We must ensure progress does not create the inequalities or divergences we are seeking to overcome. We must have the vision and the will to transform old development models and invest in social and environmental protection schemes to build resilience and shield the most vulnerable from external shocks. We are cognizant of this tremendous responsibility and of our individual and collective role in making the most of the enormous opportunity for change that it provides. We need to do more than simply understand the connections, we must act on them. As students now and as future leaders in whichever field you choose – I hope you are able to take this vision of sustainable development, and incorporate it in your actions, choices and decisions – wherever you find yourselves. Remembering the wise words of an old proverb, “We do not inherit the Earth from our ancestors; we borrow it from our children”.

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

PEACE, DEVELOPMENT & SOCIETY LINKS:

http://erleargonza.blogspot.com, http://unladtau.wordpress.com, http://www.facebook.com, http://www.newciv.org, http://sta.rtup.biz, http://magicalsecretgarden.socialparadox.com, http://en.netlog.com/erlefrayne, http://www.blogster.com/erleargonza, http://www.articlesforfree.net, http://ipeace.us, http://internationalpeaceandconflict.org, http://www.blogleaf.com/erleargonza, http://erleargonza.seekopia.com, http://lovingenergies.spruz.com, http://multiply.com/erleargonza, http://www.blogleaf.com/erleargonza, http://talangguro.blogfree.net

Thursday, June 12, 2008

FAO SUMMIT OVER: WILL FOOD OVERFLOW OUR PLATES THEREAFTER?

Erle Frayne Argonza


Good afternoon, Fellows of Planet Earth!

The FAO just concluded the global food summit recently in Europe, and many concerned fellows are asking whether there will be an overflowing of food in our plates after this conference. For the simple folks, the double query is whether there will be food in their plate, and whether food prices can go down a bit to alleviate the hurt on their pockets.

You see, when folks’ pockets are in pain at the same time that food prices are prohibitive and food availability insecure, chances are that they’d go out rioting. We saw the rioting take burst forth in at least thirty-seven (37) countries across the globe.
So, after the FAO summit, is food guaranteed for everyone else (food security) at fairly affordable price (fair trade)? And, may it be added, without those anarchic riots that go with food-related protests? Whether these answers were responded to in the summit isn’t really clear after all. It seems that the food body ended with more questions to answer than for a reduction of those that already hound the food sector.

Let’s take the issues one at a time. First of all, the food prices went up sky high couples of weeks back due largely to predatory financiers’ speculations on the food commodity futures. And this speculation was made possible largely due to the liberalized currency, financial and monetary markets, thanks to the GATT-Uruguay Rounds and the preceding liberalization efforts that began way back 1971 yet.

That’s why, when tasked to re-draw the policy architecture for the food sector in the Philippines, this expert, acting as project consultant for a national NGO coalition here, recommended the strict enforcement of monetary and financial control measures as part of ‘fair trade’ policies. Volatile currency and financial markets redound to food insecurity in the short run, as the facts now reveal. (See the book E. Argonza, Fair Trade and Food Security: Framework and Policy Architecture, Kaisampalad, 2005/08.)

Next comes those affecting the backward and forward linkages of the food sector. The monopoly of patents (note Monsanto case), inefficient production technologies, pest management issues, and other related issues continue to pester the supply side. Hoarding and smuggling pester the sector on the demand side. Then, there is the high protection walls of Northern economies on the sector, trade barriers that are nowhere near to being addressed.

There are much more issues to reflect about. Name a contentious issue, and find out whether this was answered by the summit. FAO summits are now turning to be more like the WTO meetings that ended in fiasco. With fiasco comes violent protests as expected. Incidentally, we can’t put protests on our plates to nourish our bodies.

[Writ 11 June 2008, Quezon City, MetroManila]