SCIENCE IN VENEZUELA UNDER CHAVEZ
Erle Frayne D. Argonza
Did science sleep or did
it get boosted further under the late President Chavez of Venezuela? The
subject has become an issue for debates in Venezuela during the time of the
election aimed at finding a replacement for the deceased Bolivarian patriot.
Now that the elections are
over, with poll results showing a clear victory for the Bolivarian protégé of
Chavez, the polarization involving the
scientific community may hopefully be settled a bit, as researchers should be
getting down to brass tacks to produce more study findings for the developing
country.
Broadly, interest in
science had multiplied by several folds since Chavez began his presidency.
There were only around 1500 scientists in Venezuela before the Chavez era, a
number that zoomed to 10,250 during the incumbency of the pro-grassroots strong
man.
For a country that has
seen science as an exclusive domain of the academe, the Chavez science domain
proved to be innovative in that science moved away from that exclusionary
academic pursuit that preceded his time. This, to my mind, is a welcome
development, that science should serve the broad interest and needs of the
people in that it is able to generate technologies enabling better work procedures
and productivity.
The issue at hand is shown
in the report below.
[Manila, 03 May 2013]
After Chávez: the mixed
legacy of revolutionary science
Andrea Small Carmona
There's one area in which all Venezuelan
scientists agree: that the 14 years of Hugo Chávez's presidency changed the way
that science
was done in the Latin American nation. It is whether this change was for
better or for worse that they disagree on.
As Venezuela
heads to presidential elections on Sunday (14 April), following Chavez's death
last month, its scientists are examining the legacy of his 'revolution' —
politicising the sector and minimising the power of universities,
which he perceived as serving the bourgeoisie, while boosting researcher
numbers and funding.
·
The death of
Hugo Chávez in March has triggered presidential elections this week
·
Commentators
are looking back on his legacy in science, such as increased resources and
tensions with universities
·
Science has
become politicised and the two camps continue to disagree on his impact
They are also pondering how a new
president may — or may not — change the scientific
environment in this socialist state.
Quantity over quality?
A significant increase in the number
of scientists is often held up as one of the most important accomplishments
of the Chávez era.
In February this year José Luis Berroterán, vice minister for work and science,
announced that the country had reached a new milestone: there were now more
than 10,250 researchers working in Venezuela. Before Chávez was
elected in 1998, there were around 1,500.
"Chávez's policies attracted much more will to work in local
science," says Palmira Guevara, a biology professor at the Central
University of Venezuela.
The figure does not include the around 6,000 citizen scientists or
"science followers — people that may have never had the chance to formally
study at the university, but whose ideas are very valuable", she adds.
"That would make a total of nearly 16,000 people working in science
now," she tells SciDev.Net.
"We're proud to be breaking the paradigm of science coming exclusively
from academia."
But Claudio Bifano, current president of the Academy of Physical,
Mathematical and Natural Sciences of Venezuela, is not impressed.
He says that in 2009, the government replaced the two-decade-old system for
evaluating scientists with one in which scientists were judged not only for
their experience and studies, but also for their political views.
"For many of us the credentials of these new researchers are a very well
kept secret and that's bad," he tells SciDev.Net.
"Experienced researchers have to fight fiercely for government funding
while others might benefit only because of their pro-government political
position. We don't consider it to be a transparent system," Bifano says.
Chávez's policies
attracted local scientists and now there are over 16,000 working in Venezuela
A battle with universities
Other widely hailed successes of Chavez's policies were the creation of a
dedicated science ministry in 1999, and 2005 legislation, known as the Organic
Law on Science, Technology and Innovation (LOCTI), which regulates the national
science goals and private
sector financial contributions to research.
Jaime Requena, a local researcher who for the past ten years has been compiling
a history of Venezuelan science, tells SciDev.Net
that both moves were significant.
"[The law] worked incredibly well for some years. It forced private
companies to choose research
projects in universities and institutes and finance them directly, mostly
suiting their own needs," Requena says.
"But in 2009, the government
decided that they would receive the money directly and decide
whose projects would be financed. By then the conflict between the
government and universities for political reasons was already well known, and
universities were basically excluded from financing," he says.
Chávez often accused universities of educating only the children of the
bourgeoisie, and therefore not
aligning with the goals of his socialist revolution. Instead, he preferred
'socialist science', which benefits ordinary people.
Since 2006, the government has granted public universities the same amount of
money every year, without adjusting for high inflation rates and devaluations
of the national currency, adding to tensions with universities.
"I predict that this war will inevitably kill research within five years,
if it continues. [The government's] criteria for assigning resources is,
overall, political and not scientific," says Requena.
A funding rollercoaster
But another camp of researchers praise what they perceive to have been a
hike in funding in recent years. Miguel Alfonzo, an immunologist at the
Central University of Venezuela, says the "official statistics show that
there has never been a bigger investment in science and technology as during
Chávez's rule".
He says investment has grown from 0.4 to 2.7 per cent of gross domestic product
(around US$1.3 billion a year. "We don't understand how anybody can
complain about it," he says.
But Requena says that nobody seems to know where this extra science funding is
ending up — the funding freeze for universities means they have budget
deficits, and outdated laboratories and equipment.
Critics also say that despite the government passing a requirement for
scientists to publish in national journals, those same journals have not been
funded for the past three years.
Alfonzo says funding for the journals has been suspended because the money was
diverted into a new centralised digital publications system, which appears to
have been delayed.
Not about the money?
When it comes to shortfalls, scientists critical of Chávez also cite the patent
system as an example of bad administration.
"There hasn't been a single approved patent in Venezuela since 2002, although at
least 50 requests have been filed," Ismardo Bonalde, head of the
technology centre at the Venezuelan Institute for Scientific Research (IVIC),
told SciDev.Net last year.
One of two
satellites will help Venezuela
deliver telemedicine services, however the satellites were not constructed
locally
According to Bonalde, one of the main
reasons for this is a lack of updated legislation: the current law on patents
was approved by congress in 1956.
The past 14 years of government have also resulted in scientists leaving the
country, apparently in search of better working conditions. Between January and
May 2010, 173 professors quit Simón
Bolívar University,
and four hundred researchers left the Central University of Venezuela between
2009 and 2012. They did so because of poor salaries and benefits, says Bifano.
"There was a strong generation of scientists, from which we come. But
we're getting old now, close to retirement and it's a problem not to have fresh
motivated people to replace us," he says.
Bifano says that full-time researchers
with a PhD and 12 years experience would earn around US$1,140 a month in Venezuela.
"In Colombia,
our closest neighbours, a scientist with the same profile earns roughly
US$4,500 a month. Add to this our social conditions: 30 per cent yearly
inflation and high crime rates. Who would want to stay here?"
Guevara agrees that the salaries are low, but says they are justified:
"The life of a full-time professor in Venezuela is completely flexible — that
has to be considered part of the benefits we receive. The conditions might not
be ideal, but we're working on it. I dare say there's no country in the world
right now that offers better chances of personal and professional development
to young people as Venezuela."
She adds that the aim of the revolution is to work for the people, not make
money. She cites the two satellites Venezuela now has in orbit as such
achievements, which will help deliver telemedicine services to communities.
But Requena counters that purchasing
foreign technology is not the same as developing local science: "There was
no Venezuelan research in the construction of the satellites. It was all done
by China,
from head to toe, with our money. It's the equivalent of buying a personal
computer. It's yours, sure, but it doesn't mean you made it yourself."
An endless debate
Did Chávez improve science? There is no consensus, and his government
allowed politicisation of a sector that some, such as Bifano, think must remain
independent.
As the elections near, scientists have started looking to the future, and both
main candidates have identified science as an areas to improve if they win.
Henrique Capriles Radonski, the opposition candidate, has offered to
"build a modern science, technology and innovation system that will
develop research, productivity and knowledge transfer".
Meanwhile, Nicolás Maduro, appointed by Chávez as his political successor, has
proposed to create a national network of technological parks to develop
science, technology and innovation.
"We would like to see a new government led by Capriles Randonski, working
with transparency in the administration of funds," Bifano says.
"Also, we would like to see a president who is more into supporting
universities than fighting with them. That's vital for progress."
For Guevara, the situation is clear: "Our bet is for Nicolás Maduro to
continue Chávez's legacy in science and technology. We think people will
recognise that socialism is the best way to do things."
Whoever wins, the debate on the best way forward for Venezuelan science seems
to be here to stay.