POWER SHIFT FROM WEST TO EAST NOW COMPLETE
Erle Frayne D. Argonza
Gracious Day to you fellow
global citizens!
“Young Man, Go East!” was
John Naisbitt’s challenging call unto the youth of the west who are eager to
search for opportunities in life. In the late 90s yet, he released his social
forecast book Megatrends Asia, which
sums up macro- trends happening in Asia that
all point out to the compass of economic and cultural growth of the 21st
millennium: East will be center of global development.
Futurologists or social
forecasters from the West, beginning with Oswald Spengler and Arnold Toynbee a
century ago, forewarned the West of the eventual decline in the future. Toynbee
used a cyclical wave model to show that a civilization or ‘high culture’ lasts only
for 2,000 years, after which it will decline rapidly.
Indo-European ‘high
cultures’ were nearing the end of that 2000-year cycle in the early 1900s,
which prompted futurologists to write daring forecasts of what’s in store for
the West in general. Though accordingly the West will sustain the momentum
towards high levels of technological development, the overall civilizational
maturity has been reached as was nearing the terminal end phase.
The American sociologist
Daniel Bell followed up on the social forecasts in his brilliant discourses on
the Post-Industrial society. Writing in the 1950s yet, upon seeing some Asian
economies jettison their amazing industrial growth, predicted that the end of
the Western prominence, both techno-economically and culturally, is already at
hand. He daringly registered that the year 2013 will be the precise year of the
civilizational shift.
It took yet younger social
forecasters, notably Alvin Toffler and John Naisbitt, to follow up on the
emerging global developments and observe the amazing rise of Asian ‘dragons’
and ‘tigers’. By the 1990s, both thinkers held the convergent opinion that Asia will be the trend-setter techno-economically and
culturally in the forthcoming 21st century.
To complete the picture of
global rise to prominence of Asia, Immanuel
Wallerstein, then president of the American Sociological Society, explained in
the late 1990s that civilization was actually moving towards the East by the 16th
century yet. Tragically, the Western powers intervened to undercut that
process, colonized the East via imperious methods of encumbrances, and ended
what could have been a gargantuan awesome experience of East-led global
development.
As Western imperialism,
colonialism, and hegemonism considerably declined by the latter part of the 20th
century, so was the momentum of techno-economic, political, and cultural
development propelled in the East. By
the latter years of the 1990s, there was no more doubting the predictions made
by social forecasters that indeed the compass of civilization will soon move to
the East.
Upon the catastrophic
entrapment of the economies of Europe, USA,
and Japan
in short recessions that congealed into a Great Recession in 2007, the momentum
was finally lost on the West. Japan
was only partly saved due to its Asian location and trade positioning
strategies, though its economy was flat since 1994 yet. By early 2008, Western
global observers released their consensual evaluation that Asia
already overtook the West in cutting edge technologies by the end of 2007.
By global observers I mean
those coming from international magazines, thinktanks, and academe. The
economic analysts of the Time Magazine, Far Eastern Economic Review, The
Guardian, and Newsweek, for instance, came up with that very upbeat
observation, as Asia was growing while the
West was stagnating technologically and crashing down economically.
It’s now 2014 and many
developments that boggle the mind did happen since 2007. As far as wealth
production from the ‘physical economy’ is concerned, Asia
is leading and showing the way towards keeping the global economy afloat. The
West, on the other hand, is mired in ‘bubble economy’ or ‘virtual economy’ cul de sac, which promises only
short-cycle growths that can burst again in the near future.
The power shift is now
complete, though the shift doesn’t mean that the East will supplant the West in
global importance. The Eastern mind thinks in terms of inclusive development,
in contradistinction from the Western mind that is binary/dichotomous, zero-sum
in practice, and pursues development at the expense of the small nations of
East and South.
Western peoples better
accustom themselves to the emerging reality and cease to be bellicose and
hostile towards the Eastern peoples whom they pejoratively condescended upon
for centuries as “monkeys” or “halfway between man and ape.” Civilization’s
root word is ‘civility’, and that means if some nations become prosperous, so
must all nations be some day, all marching together in a global ethos of goodwill
and cooperation rather than destroying the weaker ones.
[Manila, 01 January, 2014]
No comments:
Post a Comment