CLIMATE
CHANGE: PLANETARY OR GALACTIC?...ROCKET SCIENTIST BACKTRACKS GLOBAL WARMING
Erle Frayne
Argonza
We cannot deny,
as shown by evidences, that Earth changes are taking place today. There are no
fixed interpretations of the changes though, and the scientific community is
the least unified about such interpretations.
Whether the
fixed idea of ‘global warming is carbon-based monstrosity’ is fully accepted
across the sciences and civic groups remains as a hot issue. It is, for one
thing, too contentious, and in my opinion as a social scientist, too
reductionist with pugnacious eco-fascist underpinnings.
Astronomers
have recently reported updates about all planets of the solar system undergoing
changes in their polar areas. Even the sun does not escape its own equivalent
changes that have repercussions on the electromagnetic belt of our very own
planet.
Unfortunately,
global Establishment media and information niches have released the news in
separate, isolated packets so that they won’t be noticed by the public, thus
sustaining the rather erroneous and suspicious fixed idea of a carbon-based or
human intervention-induced Earth changes.
Below is a news
item about an Australian rocket scientist who was previously among the most
vocal interpellators of a carbon-based global warming problematic. The same
scientist has now backtracked on his previous statement, indicating as such the
disagreements within the scientific community about the subject.
[27 July 2008, Quezon City, MetroManila.
Thanks to the Executive Intelligence Review database news.]
Former
Global Warming Rocket Scientist Cools to Reality
July 18, 2008
(EIRNS)—
An Australian
Greenhouse Office consultant from 1999 to 2005, David Evans, now slams the
global warming theory he once supported. In an opinion piece in Rupert
Murdoch’s national newspaper, The Australian, Evans stated that: I am
the rocket scientist who wrote the carbon accounting model (FullCAM) that
measures Australia’s
compliance with the Kyoto Protocol, in the land use change and forestry sector.”We
scientists had political support, the ear of government, big budgets, and we
felt fairly important and useful (well, I did anyway). It was great. We were
working to save the planet.”
Evans said he initially
thought the evidence seemed “pretty good,” but had admitted it was not
conclusive. Now he says straight out: “There is no evidence to support the idea
that carbon emissions cause significant global warming. None. The Labor
Government is about to deliberately wreck the economy in order to reduce carbon
emissions. [They are] going to be regarded as criminally negligent or
ideologically stupid for not having seen through it. And if the Liberals
support the general thrust of their actions, they will be seen likewise.”
No comments:
Post a Comment