WILL PHILIPPINE INSURGENCIES END
SOON?
Erle Frayne D. Argonza
Magandang
hapon! Good afternoon!
It
is still poll day as of this writing, as the day’s polling time has been
extended till 7 p.m. Poll-related incidence had accordingly dropped by 200%
since 2004, an encouraging development amidst a backdrop of systemic violence.
What
I’d reflect about this time is the insurgency question: whether the country’s
decades-old insurgencies will cease after the installation of a new national
leadership. The communist and Bangsamoro insurgents have been conducting peace
talks with the Philippine state for a long time now, and there’s no question
that insurgencies’ end is in the wish list of diverse stakeholders.
In
a society where trust has been torn asunder by the prevalence of polarized mind
frames for centuries now, it is understandable that insurgencies will persist
for some time. Building mutual trust and confidence is therefore a sine qua non
to the end of insurgencies.
Economistic
apperceptions of insurgencies, such as to account them solely to high poverty
incidence, would hardly hold water. Canada,
for instance, is a prosperous country with good governance in place, yet a part
of it (Quebec)
almost bolted away from the Canadian state.
Addressing
poverty, which is now at 33-35% incidence rate, is surely a must, added to food
security. There is no denying that this has been on the agenda of peace talks,
aside from the options for the livelihood of combatant insurgents when they go
back to the mainstream in the case of a political settlement.
What
we can see from the economistic discourse is that addressing poverty and social
injustices would be good approaches to re-building trust and confidence. During the first two (2) years of the new
political dispensation, there has to be a trickling down of incomes to enable
poverty reduction, which should convince the insurgents of the sincerity and
competence of the leadership in handling the socio-economic malaise of our
society.
Furthermore,
there has to be relentless efforts made by civil society, church, state, and
philanthropic groups to build a culture of tolerance and peace. Peace talks
shouldn’t be left to government and insurgents alone, in other words, but
should involve the broadest sector of society.
The
building of mutual trust, confidence, and contextual building of peace and
tolerance, will redound to constructing greater civility and cooperation. A
‘dialogue of civilizations’ is a broad manifestation of a culture of peace and
tolerance permeating the private sphere, which is a cherished human condition
by the peoples of the world.
Insurgents
are incidentally growing old, and are getting weary of the war itself. They
want peace, and this is a boon to the peace talks. In our day-to-day conduct of
affairs as a people, we should continue to build trust in the private spaces of
our lives. This, we hope, would encourage insurgents to forge new social
arrangements with us on a people-to-people basis, a step that would bring us
closer to a high-trust environment.
We
must also continue to exert pressure on the Phiippine state and insurgents to
continue to dialogue and put a time limit to the peace talks. Peace talks have
already dragged on for decades, so maybe it would prove fruitful to put a time
cap on the talks. We can use organizational instruments that we have, such as
professional, crafts, and civil society groups.
Let
us hope that we don’t have a hawkish regime forthcoming. A regime of hawks
would be anachronistic to the overall trend today of higher expectations for
peace and a sustained dialogue between state and insurgents.
We
are all running against time today, even as we citizens of an war-torn country
are tired and weary of the wars. New weapons of mass destruction, such as the
Tesla Earthquake Machine or TEM, are moving out of assembly lines, and sooner
or later they would be traded via organized crime groups to hot-headed
insurgent and jihadist groups locally.
A
wish indeed, let us hope that the two (2) insurgencies will be settled finally,
with the former rebels integrated into the mainstream to participate in
parliamentary politics and civil society engagements. This will give us
breathing spaces we need to concur more social cooperation and economic
amelioration in the short run.
With
the large insurgencies gone, the police & military forces can then focus
their efforts on clamping down jihadist movements that we perceive as illegitimate
or criminal groups. In no way should government negotiate with groups that
possess warped sense of community and are unwilling to recognize the full
import of dialogue and tolerance.
[Philippines,
10 May 2010.]
No comments:
Post a Comment